CPS Energy’s cautious approach to clean energy - storage battery

CPS Energy because of its so-
An energy program known as "flexible.
This is largely because the plan includes at least 2042 of coal power generation.
The company also expects that by 2040, half of the power of CPS Energy will come from clean energy.
Coal is not only a more expensive energy source, but also a major source of carbon dioxide emissions, and a major contributor to climate change.
With the rapid development of renewable energy technologies, natural gas prices are expected to remain low for decades --
Thanks to fracking.
Seeing that coal is expected to remain in the portfolio of CPS Energy in the coming years, environmental groups are particularly painful.
Less coal, or no coal, could mean more clean energy.
"It's ridiculous to think we should have any coal anywhere near 2042," Terry Burns, chairman of the Alamo group at the Sierra Leone Club, said in a statement.
This frustration is understandable.
It is commendable to hope that San Antonio's power generation will not emit greenhouse gases.
But more subtle and realistic discussions will benefit the community.
Coal will be a long part of San Antonio, which is unfortunate but not ridiculousEnergy mix.
This is not so much a bad policy as a product of bad timing.
Keep in mind that CPS Energy opened its Spruce 2 coal plant in 2010 for $1 billion.
This is a different era in terms of gas prices and renewable technologies.
The life of this plant is 55 years.
Cris Eugster, chief operating officer of CPS energy, said yes, Spruce 2 may be offline, but it needs to be replaced by another energy source, possibly natural gas.
This is an untenable blow for taxpayers.
Given how fast technology is moving, it doesn't make any sense.
For now, CPS Energy cycles its coal-
About half the capacity of the power supply, says Eugster.
When the wind is weakened in the morning, coal-fired power plants will start to meet peak demand.
They also offer a lot.
The backbone of the Texas energy market.
This dynamic may change as renewable energy and battery storage technologies evolve, which is why the program is called flexible.
This flexible approach is expected to generate half of the electricity generated by CPS energy from renewable sources by 2040.
Can utility companies do better in this regard? This is a question of fairness.
Some aspects of the flexible plan certainly deserve further review and discussion.
CPS Energy, for example, said it would need to run the old Spruce 1 unit by 2030.
The plant dates back to 1992, requiring $0. 13 billion in pollution control.
If the plant is really going to run for more than 12 years, then CPS Energy may need to work on these pollution controls.
Otherwise, the utility needs to explore the accelerated timeline.
Utilities are also working on retirement. H.
Braunig gas plant in the 2020 s
This is an opportunity to be more aggressive in renewable energy.
The public can also benefit from more information.
Why not release emissions data online and real
CPS Energy time-to-Energy hybrid update utilities are in a unique position to drive this dialogue.
Can utility companies set more ambitious clean energy targets in their flexible plans, and if so, what does that mean for taxpayers, the flexible plan for CPS Energy should be seen as the beginning, not the end, of a long-term community dialogue.
This is a dialogue enhanced by the urban climate action plan.
The Spruce 2 plant is relatively new, which means that coal will almost certainly be part of the cp energy portfolio for decades, but this reality does not mean that CPS cannot remain a leader in clean energy.